There is now a new way to accurately measure gas bubbles in pipelines.
In the end, it all comes down to safety as the ability to measure gas bubbles in pipelines is vital to the manufacturing, power and petrochemical industries.
In the case of harvesting petrochemicals from the seabed, warning of bubbles present in the harvested crude is crucial because otherwise when these bubbles come up from the seabed (where pressure is very high) to the surface where the rig is, the reduction in pressure causes these bubbles to expand and could cause a “blow out.” A blow out is the sudden release of oil and/or gas from a well and issues with the blow out preventer were key in Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010.
Currently, the most popular technique for estimating the gas bubble size distribution (BSD) is to send sound waves through the bubble liquid and compare the measured attenuation of the sound wave (loss in amplitude as it propagates) with that predicted by theory.
The key problem is the theory assumes the bubbles exist in an infinite body of liquid. If in fact the bubbles are in a pipe, then the assumptions of the theory do not match the conditions of the experiment. That could lead to errors in the estimation of the bubble population.
There is now a new method, which takes into account that bubbles exist in a pipe, said Professor Tim Leighton from the Institute of Sound and Vibration Research at the University of Southampton, who is leading a project team.
Leighton and his team started the work as part of an ongoing program to devise ways of accurately estimating the BSD for the mercury-filled steel pipelines of the target test facility (TTF) of the $1.4 billion Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), one of the most powerful pulsed neutron sources in the world.
The research explores how measured phase speeds and attenuations in bubbly liquid in a pipe might invert to estimate the BSD (independently measured using an optical technique). This new technique, appropriate for pipelines such as TTF, gives good BSD estimations if the frequency range is sufficiently broad.
“The SNS facility was built with the expectation that every so often it would need to be shut down and the now highly radioactive container of the mercury replaced by a new one, because its steel embrittles from radiation damage,” Leighton said. “However, because the proton beam impacts the mercury and generates shock waves, which cause cavitation bubbles to collapse in the mercury and erode the steel, the replacement may need to be more often than originally planned at full operating power. Indeed, achieving full design power is in jeopardy.
“With downtime associated with unplanned container replacement worth around $12 million, engineers at the facility are considering introducing helium bubbles, of the correct size and number, into the mercury to help absorb the shock waves before they hit the wall, so that the cavitation bubbles do not erode the steel. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and the Science and Facilities Research Council (Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, RAL) commissioned us as part of their program to devise instruments to check that their bubble generators can deliver the correct number and size of bubbles to the location where they will protect the pipelines from erosion.
“This paper reports on the method we devised half-way through the research contract. It works, but just after we designed it the 2008 global financial crash occurred, and funds were no longer available to build the device into the mercury pipelines of ORNL. A more affordable solution had to be found, which is what we are now working on. The original design has been put on hold for when the world is in a healthier financial state. This has been a fantastic opportunity to work with nuclear scientists and engineers from ORNL and RAL.”