Your one-stop web resource providing safety and security information to manufacturers

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is the second part of a two-part series on responsibilities of communities, companies and first responders when it comes to chemical safety incidents.

There is no way around it, chemical manufacturers are often located within communities, and for the most part, everything works and goes along smoothly, but in case of an emergency, effective response training and planning, as well as communication between a company, first responders, and the community, are critical to preventing injuries and fatalities from incidents.

First responders, companies, and residents all play a crucial role in ensuring risks and hazards present in the community are well-understood, and there are ongoing discussions on how to mitigate or respond to them. In addition, everyone has to be on the same page.

RELATED STORIES
Quality Emergency Response Means Communication
Dust Explosions Spark Safety Alert
Relationship Aids in Refinery Blast, Fire
Combustible Dust Hazard ‘Call to Action’

To that point, the Chemical Safety Board (CSB) highlighted key responsibilities of first responders, communities, and companies pertaining to responding to chemical incidents:

Cyber Security

MGPI Processing, Inc. toxic chemical release October 20, 2016: Over 120 MGPI employees and members of the public sought medical attention.

As-found state of connection area post-incident. Sulfuric acid fill line padlock (circled) placed on angle iron. Sodium hypochlorite dust cap on ground beneath fill lines.
Source: CSB

On October 21, 2016, a chemical release occurred at the MGPI Processing, Inc. (“MGPI”) facility in Atchison, Kansas, when a chemical delivery truck, owned and operated by a different company, inadvertently connected its sulfuric acid hose to a tank containing sodium hypochlorite, better known in its less concentrated form as bleach. The chemicals reacted and generated a toxic vapor cloud, which led to a shelter-in-place order for thousands of residents. At least 120 MGPI employees and members of the public sought medical attention as a result of the incident.

Key Findings
The CSB found neither the city nor the county adequately trained for such a potentially catastrophic incident. While all important, a majority of recent emergency response training and exercises focused largely on infectious diseases, active shooter situations, and severe weather events. These training exercises did not include incidents at chemical facilities or incidents involving accidental releases of unknown chemicals in the community.

Following the incident, city and county emergency responders conducted a post-incident evaluation to examine issues identified during the response. The After-Action Report and Improvement Plan (AAR & IP), issued by the Atchison County Department of Emergency Management (ACDEM), identified several areas for improvement. For example, there were challenges communicating the incident to the public as well as updating the local hospital; and the CodeRED community notification system, which is a mass notification system that can alert and inform subscribers of emergencies through many channels, failed to send notifications out at the time of the incident. Local emergency responders used social media and local radio and television instead to communicate details about the incident. ACDEM noted the CodeRED notifications did not get sent due to a lack of training on the system.

Hospital staff reported they were not kept informed of the status of potential victims and decontamination procedures for the chemicals released during the incident. In addition, incident command system personnel did not directly communicate information regarding the released chemicals to the hospitals until up to two hours after the incident began. According to ACDEM, a plan has been established with local hospitals to have a representative at the emergency operations center or command post to ensure the representative is up-to-date on all information.

The AAR & IP also identified the need for more operational coordination and a liaison to communicate exposure information during similar incidents. Following the incident, MGPI increased its involvement with local emergency planners and responders. Less than two months after the incident, MGPI hosted training with local emergency responders to discuss the hazards of chemicals used at the MGPI facility. Three separate sessions were held. In addition, in October 2017, MGPI attended and participated in a Tabletop Exercise in Hiawatha, Kansas, where a chlorine gas release resulting from a railcar derailment was simulated.

Emergency responders and facilities have also increased participation in the Atchison County LEPC, and in March 2017, the LEPC conducted a tabletop exercise of the incident that occurred at MGPI. MGPI also requested its Emergency Response Plan be discussed at the end of each year.

Arkema Inc. Chemical Plant Fire, August 29, 2017: On August 24, 2017, Hurricane Harvey made landfall in southeast Texas and produced unprecedented amounts of rainfall over the area, causing substantial flooding.

Photo shows the devastation that occurred at the Arkema chemical plant in Crosby, TX, after Hurricane Harvey hit the area. Explosions wiped out chemical storage pods at the facility after refrigeration units were not able to operate due to the flooding.

This flooding exceeded the equipment design elevations at the Arkema Inc. (“Arkema”) facility in Crosby, Texas, and caused the plant to lose power, which disabled the critical organic peroxide refrigeration system. The flooding eventually forced all Arkema employees to evacuate the facility. Additionally, residents within a 1.5-mile radius of the facility were evacuated. On August 31, 2017, the organic peroxide products stored inside a refrigerated trailer decomposed causing the peroxides and trailer to burn. Twenty-one people sought medical attention from exposure to fumes generated by the decomposing products when the vapor travelled across a public highway adjacent to the plant. Emergency response officials initially decided to keep the highway open even though it ran through the established evacuation zone around the Arkema facility.

Key Findings
At the time the organic peroxide products began to decompose and combust, the highway adjacent to the facility was still open. On August 30, 2017, two officers drove through a white smoke cloud on that highway. Emergency responders shut down the highway, but soon reopened it after two members of the Crosby Volunteer Fire Department assessed the scene and did not see a white cloud or other signs of organic peroxide decomposition. Reopening the highway allowed more emergency responders and residents to be potentially exposed to the fumes emitting from the facility. Only after emergency responders later confirmed the organic peroxide decomposition did they shut down all lanes of the highway. The CSB concluded during an emergency, emergency responders should be conservative when making health and safety decisions to protect themselves and the public.

The CSB recommended Harris County update its emergency operations training using lessons learned from the Arkema incident to help ensure that personnel enforcing evacuation perimeters are not harmed by exposure to hazardous chemical releases. The CSB advised the county update existing protocols and revise training curricula to include the use of analytical tools, air monitoring, and personal protective equipment, to provide appropriate protection when emergency equipment or personnel need to be moved through an evacuation zone during a hazardous materials release.

Emergency Response and Planning
In at least 16 CSB investigations, there are important key lessons to aid in planning for and responding to an emergency involving hazardous materials that when implemented will help minimize the number of fatalities and injuries.

These include:
• Everyone in the community should be aware of the chemicals used in their community and the risks they pose.
• Local emergency responders should receive adequate hazardous materials training to help them best respond to a hazardous materials emergency and allow them to identify and understand risks as they respond.
• Local emergency responders and facilities should conduct and participate in emergency response exercises to help prepare for emergencies involving hazardous materials. Lessons learned from previous chemical incidents should be used whenever possible.
• There must be effective communications and information sharing between facilities with hazardous chemicals, emergency responders, and community members before, during and after chemical emergencies.
• There should be continuous planning for emergencies. Communities should have redundant communication systems in place to notify residents of a chemical emergency. Emergency plans should be clear on the magnitude of the hazards and flexible to help adapt to different situations.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This