Safer cladding for nuclear fuel rods should give plant operators more time to react to incidents such as a station blackout.
The cladding ended up developed by an alloy of iron, chromium and aluminum, and avoids zirconium, said researchers at Department of Energy’s (DoE) Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL).
The fuel rods at civilian nuclear power plants have been sheathed with an evolving zirconium alloy for the past six decades. Zirconium as the preferred base metal was chosen in the 1950s by Hyman Rickover, then a captain and later an admiral, as he worked to take nuclear technology and use it to power ships and submarines.
His choice of cladding, as well as the light-water reactors that powered these vessels, was then adapted by the nuclear power industry and dominates plants throughout the world.
Zirconium absorbs very few of the neutrons that drive a nuclear reactor, so zirconium alloys made sense as a fuel cladding — as long as the reactor operated as planned. If a reactor loses its cooling water, however, the zirconium can make a bad problem worse.
“The issue is you have anywhere between 20 and 40 tons of zirconium metal in these reactor cores,” said ORNL nuclear engineer Kurt Terrani, who heads up the project. “Zirconium reacts with steam at high temperature, and when it reacts it produces a lot of heat and a lot of hydrogen.”
The job for Terrani’s team, as the innovation engine of the consortium led by General Electric, was to create a zirconium-free alloy that would generate as little hydrogen as possible during incidents while at the same time matching the performance of the nuclear fuel rod cladding in use today.
The project was out of the ordinary for at least three reasons, Terrani said. In the first place, the team was not interested in testing existing alloys to see if one might be appropriate. Instead, it designed the new alloy from scratch with a diverse team that included experts in nuclear engineering, materials science, radiation effects, corrosion, thermomechanics and alloy fabrication.
The approach made use of the wide range of tools and expertise available at ORNL, DoE’s biggest science and energy laboratory. The new cladding also underwent testing at ORNL’s High Flux Isotope Reactor and Idaho National Laboratory’s Advanced Test Reactor, as well as the Halden research reactor in Norway.
“This was by no means an Edisonian approach,” Terrani said, alluding to the trial-and-error approach made famous by Thomas Edison. “We worked with knowledge and tools that were not available in Rickover’s day. We designed an alloy that we knew was going to work. I’m not surprised that this alloy behaves so well under different conditions; we designed it to do so.”
Secondly, the team was able to identify and produce the alloy in six years, which is lightning fast in the nuclear industry. Conventional wisdom found the project should have taken twice the time, Terrani said.
Thirdly, he added, the project is unusual because the research and development is complete.
“The other thing I’m very proud of is we are ready to stop working on this,” he said. “We feel like we delivered it, the industry is running with it. We want to put a big fat red bow on it.”
It has now been turned over to the industry for testing and evaluation. The new cladding was placed in a reactor at Southern Nuclear’s Hatch Nuclear Power Plant in Georgia for testing in February, Terrani said, and subsequent installations are planned.